I know what your
thinking...what in the world does Chick-fil-A and the book of Daniel have in
common?
 |
| Salisbury, MD (pic-WBOC TV) |
Today is August 1st, the day I normally text or
call my sister and wish her a happy birthday.
But in addition to this routine, I made my way to Chick-fil-A for
breakfast (and a good one at that) in support of the fact that they stand for
traditional marriage. I came to my
office after breakfast, and began preparing some things for Vacation Bible
School that has been going on all week at church. This year we are doing a parody for VBS
called “Soul Wars.” But the content of
what we are teaching is based on Daniel 1-4.
So then, as I was reading some Facebook posts about people going to
Chick-fil-A and those not going, the connection between the ancient biblical
story of Daniel and the modern day uproar over Chick-fil-A hit me like a load
of bricks.
In the book of Daniel, the man Daniel and his three friends
(Hanniah, Mishael, Azariah) are punished for their beliefs. In chapter one, Daniel and his three friends
are being detoxed from their Jewish heritage and being injected with the
Babylonian culture. One of the things
that they were asked to do is participate in the dinner feast that all captives
would have attended. However, Daniel and
his three friends have an objection to eating the king’s meat. They realize the meat was likely offered to
idols and so according to their religious laws they are not to partake of
it. This causes a problem. Likewise, in chapter three there is another
problem that comes to the surface. A
golden image has been made, and the entire nation of Babylon is commanded to
worship it by bowing down. During this
ceremony, Daniel’s three friends refuse to worship the image and are then punished
for their beliefs in the one true God.
Daniel in the lion’s den in Daniel chapter 6 is very similar to chapter
3 as well. In fact, in Daniel 1-6, each
chapter has a thrust of competition or contest between the one true God and the
false gods of Babylon.
 |
| Barboursville, WV (pic-Teresa Merry) |
I look at the present Chick-fil-A uproar and I can’t help
but see a man (and company) that are being punished for their beliefs. You might say that’s not a fair comparison,
your right. If you lived in Babylon in
605 BC, then you had NO RELIGIOUS RIGHTS.
But we live in America, where our religious rights are protected by the
first amendment – at least they are supposed to be protected. Thankfully, we don’t have to endure a fiery
furnace or lion’s den for our beliefs – or do we? The lion’s that are out to get us might just
be those conspirators (chapters 3 and 6) in the book of Daniel who were looking
for something to pin on Daniel and his three friends. And you know what? The only thing they could find to pin on them
was a religious complaint...sounds similar to our current culture. At least in the culture of the book of
Daniel, the discussion of worshipping God was still on the table. It seems like the society of today is pushing
that into the past. It all boils down to
humanism, which is man’s desire to control all things and find happiness in
himself. Man wants to be in control of
his own destiny – his destiny for life, happiness, and death. So why is traditional marriage under attack? It’s because man wants to decide for himself
what constitutes marriage. He alone
wants to make that decision. The creature
believes that he knows better than the Creator.
But don’t forget the most important thing about the
connection between Chick-fil-A and the book of Daniel is the response. How the characters in the book of Daniel
responded is so crucial. In chapter one,
poise is the response knowing God was in control; in chapter two, prayer is the
response knowing that God is the only one that can help; in chapter three,
perseverance is the response realizing that God might not deliver; in chapter
four, praise is the response when you realize Who is the Most High God; in
chapter five, perspective is the response because God’s ways are often
different than ours; in chapter six, peace is the response because the most
high God rules in the kingdoms of men and gives it to whomever he chooses. The character in the book of Daniel did not
respond harshly, were not mad, upset, or went off a rampage. In fact, the respect and dignity which Daniel
had towards Nebuchadnezzar, and all the prayers he offered for him, were
rewarded as Nebuchadnezzar came to accept the one true God in chapter
four.
 |
| Jonesboro, AK (pic-John Redman) |
Believers in Christ need to respond to others who don’t hold
our beliefs with respect and dignity. It
does not make sense for liberals to have the desire to boycott companies based
on their beliefs, but then again politics might have something to do with it,
or maybe the money trail. I wonder what
would happen if 100 CEOs of the world’s largest companies came out with
statements that clearly stated their beliefs in traditional marriage? If I were
to base my consumption of goods on my beliefs then I could no longer buy gas,
have a cell phone, eat at certain restaurants, stop going to the movies, buy groceries
from certain stores...but wait, at least three times a day I could eat at
Chick-fil-A.
